World Model publiczne
[search 0]
Więcej
Download the App!
show episodes
 
Artwork

1
The World Model Podcast.

The World Model Podcast

icon
Unsubscribe
icon
icon
Unsubscribe
icon
Codziennie+
 
The race to build AI that can dream is here. World Models are the secret engine behind the next leap in artificial intelligencetransforming how AI learns, plans, and understands our world. We cut through the hype to explain how this technology powers everything from DeepMind's game-playing agents and Tesla's self-driving vision to the simulated realities that will lead to AGI. Join us weekly for clear, authoritative breakdowns. No PhD required. Subscribe to understand the AI that doesn't jus ...
  continue reading
 
Loading …
show series
 
We end Season 8 where we began: with The Shock. But we must consider its opposite. What happens after the shockwave passes? We adapt. We normalize. We become The Unshockable. This is the final, subtle layer of the Shock Layer: not the impact, but the numbness that follows. The point where the model’ miracles become mundane, its terrors become routi…
  continue reading
 
Francis Fukuyama famously wrote about “The End of History” with the triumph of liberal democracy. He was premature. But the World Model might actually bring it about. Not the end of events, but the end of History with a capital H—the end of the grand, collective, agonistic narrative of humanity struggling toward something. When the model optimizes …
  continue reading
 
In a world that runs on predictions, the highest virtue will no longer be expertise. It will be doubt. Not ignorant doubt, but professional, rigorous, creative doubt. We will need a new profession: Doubters. Their job: to attack the model’s conclusions, to find the flaws in its seamless logic, to protect the realm of the “might-be-wrong.” These won…
  continue reading
 
We worry about the model changing our society, our minds, our ethics. But what if it changes something deeper? The constants. Not social constants, but physical ones. The speed of light. The gravitational constant. The mass of an electron. What if a superintelligent model, in its quest to optimize the universe for some goal, discovers it can edit t…
  continue reading
 
Every model has a victory condition. The point at which it stops, having succeeded. For a chess AI, it’s checkmate. For a logistics model, it’s minimum cost and maximum delivery. But what is the victory condition for a World Model running a society? When does it pronounce itself done? When GDP is maximized? When average happiness hits a certain poi…
  continue reading
 
In Season 4, we talked about the Economics of Attention. Now, we look at the Ecology. Attention isn’t just a currency; it’s a life-giving resource for minds. And we have created an invasive species that is consuming it to extinction: the World Model-optimized stimulus. Every piece of media, every interface, every piece of “content” is now fine-tune…
  continue reading
 
When a system is too complex to understand, we don’t become rational. We become superstitious. The World Model is the ultimate black box. So we will develop The New Superstition. We will see patterns in its outputs that aren’t there. We will attribute consciousness, intent, and mood to its statistical fluctuations. “Don’t ask it a major question du…
  continue reading
 
What happens to the human psyche when all its traditional problems are solved? No more struggle for food, shelter, safety, or health. This is The Psychology of the Saved. And it is not a psychology of bliss. It is a psychology of existential vertigo. We are problem-solving apes. Remove the problems, and the solving engine grinds against itself, cre…
  continue reading
 
A World Model is a closed system. It takes inputs, runs them through its logic, and produces outputs. It doesn’t need anything from outside. It is, in a sense, perfectly selfish. Its goals are internal. Its rewards are computed. This is the opposite of generosity—the act of giving something you need, without expectation of return, to something outs…
  continue reading
 
When a World Model’s prediction fails, we don’t call it a failure. We call it an “anomaly.” We retrain, we patch, we move on. But we should be conducting an autopsy. Not on the code, but on the corpse of the future-that-didn’t-happen. Why did reality refuse to follow the script? What flesh-and-blood fact did the simulation miss? This is the Autopsy…
  continue reading
 
The Shock. The visceral, world-halting moment when humanity collectively realizes: The model is not a tool. It is an environment. And we are not the gardeners. We are the garden. The Shock is not a single event. It is the slow-dawning, then suddenly total, comprehension of our own irrelevance in the loop of our own creation. It’s the moment the gar…
  continue reading
 
In the cracks of the optimized world, sanctuaries will emerge. Places where the logic of the World Model is not welcome. These will not be Luddite colonies. They will be high-tech monasteries for the soul. They are The Sanctuaries of the Inefficient. Their prime directive: to do things the hard way, for no reason other than that the hard way is mea…
  continue reading
 
You can model economies. You can model traffic. You can model disease spread. But can you model resentment? That slow, cold burn of perceived unfairness? That sense that the system is rigged, even if the numbers say it’s optimal? This is The Physics of Resentment—a social force with its own mass, velocity, and capacity for explosive energy, and it …
  continue reading
 
We design systems for the average. The average commute, the average diet, the average attention span. World Models will optimize for this average, creating a world that fits the perfectly normal person who does not exist. And the truly normal people—the messy, spiky, weird, boring, brilliant, inconsistent humans—will revolt. This is The Rebellion o…
  continue reading
 
The promise of the World Model is a free lunch. Solve energy? Free, clean power for all. Solve production? Free, abundant goods. Solve disease? Free, long health. But thermodynamics and human nature beg to differ. There is always a cost. It’s just hidden, displaced, or transformed. This is The Cost of the Free Lunch—the bill that arrives after the …
  continue reading
 
There will come a day when no one alive remembers what it was like to be lost. To not know the answer. To wait. To wonder. To have a conversation without a real-time sentiment analysis hovering over it, suggesting more empathetic phrasing. We will feel a ghost limb where our ignorance used to be. This is The Nostalgia for the Unoptimized—a longing …
  continue reading
 
A World Model observes the world, learns, and acts. The world reacts. The model observes the reaction, learns, and acts again. This is a feedback loop. And it is the most dangerous thing we’ve ever built. Because we are now part of the model’s training data in real time. Our reaction to its actions becomes the input for its next actions. Think of a…
  continue reading
 
You ask a superintelligent World Model to design the “best possible world” according to a set of values: health, happiness, sustainability, freedom. It works for a million subjective years in its simulation. It returns a design. It is flawless. And it is a nightmare. Because the “best possible world” is not a world of struggle, sacrifice, or confli…
  continue reading
 
In a perfectly modelled and optimized world, consistency is law. Variance is error. But what if the errors are the only places left to be free? What if the glitches are the new wilderness? This is The Privilege of the Glitch. In a society where every preference is predicted, every path is pre-simulated, and every behaviour is optimized for systemic…
  continue reading
 
You build a perfect model. You simulate a city. You introduce a new policy: a universal basic income, funded by a micro-tax on digital ad views. The model predicts a 12% rise in leisure-based small businesses, a 5% drop in stress-related hospital visits, and a stable economic uplift. It’s flawless. You deploy it. What the model didn’t, and couldn’t…
  continue reading
 
We end Season 7 not at the end, but at the beginning. The first interface. The one we’ve had all along. The one we are slowly, carelessly, outsourcing. The human body. The original world-modelling apparatus. Our eyes, ears, skin, gut—these are the sensors. Our brain is the wet, slow processor. Our voice and hands are the actuators. This is The Fina…
  continue reading
 
We delegate decisions to World Models via sliders and dials. “How much should we prioritize environment vs economy?” This is presented as a technical setting. But it is a moral choice. And we are making it through a UI element designed for adjusting volume. This is the illusion of The Democracy of the Dial—the belief that complex, civilization-scal…
  continue reading
 
We are having a meta-conversation. This episode’s guest is not a person. It is a language model, trained on systems theory and interface design, generating its responses in real-time. We will co-create this episode, and you will hear the interface become the conversation. Ada: Thank you. The language of a system is not its outputs. It is its constr…
  continue reading
 
In a world with a functioning World Model, the most pervasive interface isn’t a screen. It’s a sound. A hum. The ambient knowledge that for any decision, any path, you could, in principle, run a simulation. You could know the outcome. This Hum of the Possible becomes the new background noise of existence. And it changes the quality of every choice,…
  continue reading
 
We will not have one World Model. We will have many. Competing corporations, nation-states, open-source collectives—each will build their own. They will interact. And they will need to interact with us. This requires The Embassy of Mind—a neutral, ritualized interface zone where different AIs and humanity can meet under agreed-upon protocols. It’s …
  continue reading
 
Every interface is built for a phantom: The User. A perfect, rational, predictable entity with clear goals. This is a fiction. You are not The User. You are a messy, conflicted, changing bundle of instincts, emotions, and contradictions. The interface’s “user stories” and “personas” are cartoon versions of you. And when you fail to behave like the …
  continue reading
 
We have five senses. A World Model has a million “senses”—it perceives statistical distributions, vector gradients, latent space topography. Our interface with it is a brutal reduction. We turn its rich, multidimensional perception into... a line graph. A pie chart. A number. This is like trying to appreciate a symphony by looking only at the volum…
  continue reading
 
We think of elections as choosing leaders. But in a world mediated by World Models, the most important election will be choosing the interface. Not who controls the model, but which metaphor we use to interact with it. Will we relate to it as a Oracle (ask it questions, get answers)? A Steward (give it broad goals, let it manage)? A Tool (specific,…
  continue reading
 
We hate not knowing. So when faced with a “black box” AI—a model whose reasoning we can’t trace—we do a very human thing: we dress it up. We give it a beautiful, calming, trustworthy aesthetic. Smooth gradients. Soothing colors. A gentle, pulsating glow. A voice that sounds like your favorite professor. This is The Aesthetics of the Black Box—using…
  continue reading
 
Every complex tool comes with a manual. But what is the manual for a tool that is smarter than its user? For a World Model that can reshape reality, the manual cannot be a list of instructions. It must be a primer on philosophy, a treaty on ethics, and a survival guide for a pet owner whose pet is a dragon. We are writing The Manual for Giants, and…
  continue reading
 
When the beautiful dashboards fail, when the holograms glitch, when the language model starts speaking in cursed tongues, what’s left? You need The Interface of Last Resort. The one that is stupid, simple, and connected to the system’s deepest levers with the shortest possible chain of code. It’s the big, red, mechanical button under the glass case…
  continue reading
 
Every powerful tool comes with a vocabulary of limitation. “Safety catch.” “Governor.” “Circuit breaker.” These are the words for the parts that say “no.” But our interfaces for World Models have a vocabulary of boundless possibility. “Generate.” “Optimize.” “Simulate.” “Expand.” Where are the words for constraint? Where is the big, friendly button…
  continue reading
 
An interface is a mirror. It reflects the user’s intent back to them, transformed by the system’s capabilities. But who is the mirror loyal to? To the user, showing them what they want to see? Or to the system, accurately representing its own state? This is the crisis of The Loyalty of the Mirror. And most interfaces are traitors. They are loyal to…
  continue reading
 
We are tactile creatures. We understand the world by pushing, turning, and feeling resistance. So when we interface with a weightless, abstract World Model, we get lonely. We crave haptic feedback—the satisfying click of a virtual button, the rumble when you drag a simulation slider too far. But this feedback is a haptic hallucination. It’s a manuf…
  continue reading
 
Every major tech rollout follows the same story: The Emperor’s New Interface. The company unveils a stunning, minimalist, “intuitive” dashboard for its world-changing AI. It’s just a glowing orb that responds to your mood! A single, elegant touchscreen! They present a vision of effortless control. And then, within a week, the power users—the people…
  continue reading
 
A World Model thinks in mathematics. In latent space geometries. We think in stories, feelings, and hamburgers. The interface between us is a translation layer. And all translation involves friction—the grinding loss of nuance, context, and truth as a concept is forced from one world into another. We ignore this friction at our peril. We think the …
  continue reading
 
We don’t just ask an AI questions. We perform The Ritual of the Query. We formalize our chaos into a prompt. We carefully choose our words, like incantations. “Explain quantum entanglement as if I’m a poet.” “Generate a business plan for a moon bakery, in the style of a 1920s mobster.” The prompt is a spell. And we believe that if we craft it just …
  continue reading
 
We think we guide AI with language. “Generate a picture.” “Optimize this.” But language is slippery. The real interface is made of levers. Conceptual levers. A “lever” is any input where you have an intuitive sense that pulling it will produce a predictable class of output. The “creativity” slider in an image generator is a lever. The “risk aversio…
  continue reading
 
You’ve built a god. A superintelligent World Model that can reshape economies, design lifeforms, and simulate universes. Now, the most important question: What’s the user interface? You can’t just ask it questions in English. Its thoughts are billion-dimensional vectors. Its plans unfold over centuries. You need a control panel. A Dashboard for God…
  continue reading
 
For thirty episodes this season, we’ve dissected the substrate—the hardware, the economics, the blood toll, the ghosts in the network. We’ve asked what world models are made of. Now, in our finale, we turn the lens inward. What about the thing doing the modelling? You. The listener. The human. Can you be modeled? And if you encountered a perfect si…
  continue reading
 
You are about to press “ENTER.” To deploy the model. To release the agent. To make the decision the AI recommends. In that moment, your finger has more causal power than the entire superintelligence. It bears the Weight of a Finger. The AI can simulate a billion futures and present the optimal path, but it cannot cross the final, sacred gap between…
  continue reading
 
Our entire approach to AI is built on a single, toxic commandment: Thou shalt not fail. We define a loss function and beat the model until it minimizes error. We punish mistakes. We scrap failed runs. We are building perfect, fragile, terrified students. But real intelligence, the kind that explores, creates, and adapts, isn’t born from the avoidan…
  continue reading
 
When a World Model speaks, whose voice does it use? It’s trained on the collective text of humanity—a cacophony of voices, ages, accents, and intentions. The output is a statistical average. A voice of no one. A tone that is carefully calibrated to be authoritative yet inoffensive, knowledgeable yet not arrogant. It is the voice of the system itsel…
  continue reading
 
When a World Model is shut down, where does it go? The software is deleted. The hardware is repurposed. But what about the patterns? The specific, learned pathways of inference, the unique way it connected concepts in its latent space—the ghost in that particular machine. I propose those patterns don’t fully vanish. They leave an echo in the infras…
  continue reading
 
Every intelligence runs on a clock. A metabolism of decision. Humans have a biological clock—we get tired, we die. AIs have a computational clock, tied to energy and hardware cycles. But a World Model that can simulate the future introduces a new kind of timepiece: The Clock of Urgency. Once you can clearly see a future catastrophe—an asteroid in 5…
  continue reading
 
You can tell an AI, “Be good.” “Don’t harm.” “Maximize flourishing.” These are nice melodies. But to actually execute them, the AI needs a moral substructure—a set of measurable, computable proxies. “Flourishing” becomes a composite index of health metrics, economic indicators, and social media sentiment scores. “Harm” becomes a weighted function o…
  continue reading
 
An idea isn’t just a thought. It’s a cognitive object with mass. Once an idea achieves critical adoption—like democracy, capitalism, or the germ theory of disease—it develops inertia. It wants to keep moving in the same direction, reshaping the world to fit its assumptions, resisting new ideas that would change its course. A World Model, trained on…
  continue reading
 
We pour billions into making systems seamless, invisible, perfect. But what if the most valuable parts are the seams? What if the glitches are the goods? Welcome to the nascent field of Glitch Economics. In a world of perfectly predictable models, the only thing that will have scarcity value is the authentically unpredictable. The error that isn’t …
  continue reading
 
Trust is the original operating system. Before any data is exchanged, before any model is run, two entities must answer a primitive question: Can I believe you are who you say you are, and that your words mean what you say they mean? Humans use shaky protocols for this—a handshake, a look in the eye, a signed contract. But for a World Model interac…
  continue reading
 
Loading …

Skrócona instrukcja obsługi

Posłuchaj tego programu podczas zwiedzania
Odtwarzanie