Special Peer Review Week 2023 podcast with APS Associate Publications Director, Editorial and Content Development, Kara Keehan. We discuss the current bottlenecks and flaws with the current Peer Review system and the innovations and solutions currently in progress or on the horizon. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.…

Hello and welcome to the show! This is the J&J Podcast from J&J Editorial. In this episode we interview Colin Trumbull, the new co-Editor-in-Chief of EON, aka “Editorial Office News.” EON is the member magazine published by ISMTE, which (for those who are not up on all their acronyms) stands for the International Society of Managing and Technical E…

In advance of the 2021 CSE Annual Meeting, we spoke with J&J’s Executive Director Brittany Swett. Brittany is the Program Committee Co-Chair for the upcoming CSE meeting and worked tirelessly with her committee to put together a substantial schedule of speakers and presentations. She has also recently been elected to the CSE Board of Directors, mak…

Happy Peer Review week everyone! We are shaking with excitement to announce the resumption of the J&J Podcast with this special episode featuring J&J's Systems Support Coordinator, Emily Babcock! The theme for this year’s peer review week is Trust in Peer Review, and we all know that Reviewers, and the databases that we use to manage them, are a cr…

Today we meet Jennifer Deyton and Julie Nash, the "J"s of J&J Editorial. They share their stories of how they started in scholarly publishing, when they started J&J, and how they continue to support growth and professionalization for managing editors and across scholarly publishing. We also discuss the annual meeting season, including meetings from…

Today we're joined by J&J Editorial colleagues Michelle English and Brittany Swett to review 2017 and discuss the biggest disruptions in scholarly publishing. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.Autor: J&J Editorial

Parts 1-4 of our Transparency in Peer Review discussion with Tom Lang (Tom Lang Communications and Training International), Allison Leung (PLOS), David Resnik, JD, PhD (NIEHS), and Pedro Ramirez, MD (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center). In this installment we take a closer look at 1. What transparency means 2. How transparency benefi…

Part 4 of our Transparency in Peer Review discussion with Tom Lang (Tom Lang Communications and Training International), Allison Leung (PLOS), David Resnik, JD, PhD (NIEHS), and Pedro Ramirez, MD (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center). In this installment we take a closer look at how transparency addresses the limitations of traditiona…

Part 3 of our Transparency in Peer Review discussion with Tom Lang (Tom Lang Communications and Training International), Allison Leung (PLOS), David Resnik, JD, PhD (NIEHS), and Pedro Ramirez, MD (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center). In this installment we take a closer look at how transparency in review benefits the public. Music: w…

Part 2 of our Transparency in Peer Review discussion with Tom Lang (Tom Lang Communications and Training International), Allison Leung (PLOS), David Resnik, JD, PhD (NIEHS), and Pedro Ramirez, MD (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center). In this installment we take a closer look at how transparency in review benefits researchers. Music: …

Part 1 of our Transparency in Peer Review discussion with Tom Lang (Tom Lang Communications and Training International), Allison Leung (PLOS), David Resnik, JD, PhD (NIEHS), and Pedro Ramirez, MD (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center). We define several forms of transparency, and some of the implications that stakeholders should antici…