U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments podcast

Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right

הוסף לפני seven שנים

Treść dostarczona przez U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments. Cała zawartość podcastów, w tym odcinki, grafika i opisy podcastów, jest przesyłana i udostępniana bezpośrednio przez U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments lub jego partnera na platformie podcastów. Jeśli uważasz, że ktoś wykorzystuje Twoje dzieło chronione prawem autorskim bez Twojej zgody, możesz postępować zgodnie z procedurą opisaną tutaj https://pl.player.fm/legal.

This Is Woman's Work with Nicole Kalil

1
QUALIFIED: How Competency Checking and Race Collide at Work with Shari Dunn | 284 33:58

7 dni temu33:58

Na później

Listy

Polub

Polubione

33:58

In this episode, we delve into the concept of being "qualified" in the workplace, examining who gets labeled as such, who doesn't, and the underlying reasons. We explore "competency checking"—the practice of scrutinizing individuals' abilities—and how it disproportionately affects underrepresented groups, often going unnoticed or unchallenged. Our discussion aims to redefine qualifications in a fair, equitable, and actionable manner. Our guest, Shari Dunn , is an accomplished journalist, former attorney, news anchor, CEO, university professor, and sought-after speaker. She has been recognized as Executive of the Year and a Woman of Influence, with her work appearing in Fortune Magazine, The Wall Street Journal, Ad Age, and more. Her new book, Qualified: How Competency Checking and Race Collide at Work , unpacks what it truly means to be deserving and capable—and why systemic barriers, not personal deficits, are often the real problem. Her insights challenge the narratives that hold so many of us back and offer practical solutions for building a more equitable future. Together, we can build workplaces and communities that don’t just reflect the world we live in, but the one we want to create. A world where being qualified is about recognizing the talent and potential that’s been overlooked for far too long. It’s not just about getting a seat at the table—it’s about building an entirely new table, one designed with space for all of us. Connect with Our Guest Shari Dunn Website& Book - Qualified: https://thesharidunn.com LI: https://www.linkedin.com/today/author/sharidunn TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@thesharidunn Related Podcast Episodes: How To Build Emotionally Mature Leaders with Dr. Christie Smith | 272 Holding It Together: Women As America's Safety Net with Jessica Calarco | 215 How To Defy Expectations with Dr. Sunita Sah | 271 Share the Love: If you found this episode insightful, please share it with a friend, tag us on social media, and leave a review on your favorite podcast platform! 🔗 Subscribe & Review: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Amazon Music…

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

Udostępnij

Źródło serii•Feed

Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.

71 odcinków

#Government #United States

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

updated 7 lat temu

Udostępnij

Źródło serii•Feed

Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.

71 odcinków

#Government #United States

כל הפרקים

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1
Trump v. Hawaii 1:06:53

7 years temu1:06:53

1:06:53

A case in which the Court held that President Donald Trump’s Proclamation restricting travel and immigration to the US from certain countries (“travel ban”) does not violate the president’s statutory authority or the Establishment Clause of the Constitution. The Court was also asked, but did not decide, whether a global injunction barring enforcement of parts of the Proclamation is impermissibly overbroad.…

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1
Abbott v. Perez 1:17:37

7 years temu1:17:37

1:17:37

A case in which the Court decided that the district court erred in disregarding the presumption of good faith on the part of the Texas Legislature and improperly reversed the burden of proof in requiring the state to show a lack of discriminatory intent in adopting new districting plans; the Court also held that one of the state house districts at issue was an impermissible racial gerrymander.…

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1
Animal Science Products, Inc. v. Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. 1:00:32

7 years temu1:00:32

1:00:32

A case in which the Court decided that a federal court determining foreign law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 44.1 should accord respectful consideration to a foreign government’s submission, but the court is not bound to accord conclusive effect to the foreign government’s statements.

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1
Chavez-Meza v. United States 58:36

7 years temu58:36

58:36

A case in which the Court held that because the record in this case as a whole demonstrated that the judge had a reasoned basis for his decision, the judge’s explanation for reducing Adaucto Chavez-Meza’s sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) to the middle instead of the bottom of the amended Federal Guidelines range was adequate.…

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1
Pereira v. Sessions 54:48

7 years temu54:48

54:48

A case in which the Court held that a notice to appear for a removal hearing that does not specify the place and time of the hearing does not trigger the stop-time rule of 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1), which gives the attorney general discretion to cancel removal for an alien who, among other criteria, has been continuously physically present in the country for at least ten years.…

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1
Lucia v. Securities and Exchange Commission 1:00:00

7 years temu1:00:00

1:00:00

A case in which the Court decided that administrative law judges of the Securities and Exchange Commission are "officers of the United States" subject to the Constitution's Appointments Clause.

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1
Washington v. United States 1:01:32

7 years temu1:01:32

1:01:32

A case in which the Court was asked to decide, among other things, whether the state of Washington’s use of culverts to divert water violates its treaties with Indian tribes, and if so, whether the state must replace those culverts, at great cost.

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1
Lagos v. United States 57:56

7 years temu57:56

57:56

A case in which the Court held that under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3663A(b)(4), which pertains to reimbursement by defendants to victims for expenses incurred during the investigation or prosecution related to the offense, the words “investigation” and “proceedings” encompass only government investigations and criminal proceedings and do not include private investigations and civil or bankruptcy proceedings.…

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1
South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. 1:00:10

7 years temu1:00:10

1:00:10

A case in which the Court overruled Quill Corp. v. North Dakota and National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Department of Revenue of Illinois, holding that states may require sellers with no physical presence in the state to collect and remit sales tax for goods sold within the state.

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1
Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v. Appling 57:27

7 years temu57:27

57:27

A case in which the Court decided that a statement regarding a specific asset can be a “statement respecting the debtor’s . . . financial condition” under section 523(a)(2)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code.

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1
Wisconsin Central Ltd. v. United States 49:17

7 years temu49:17

49:17

A case in which the Court decided that employee stock options are not taxable “compensation” under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act because they are not “money remuneration.”

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1
WesternGeco LLC v. ION Geophysical Corp. 1:01:23

7 years temu1:01:23

1:01:23

A case in which the Court held that WesternGeco’s award for lost profits was a permissible domestic application of § 284 of the Patent Act.

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1
Benisek v. Lamone 1:02:38

7 years temu1:02:38

1:02:38

A case in which the Court upheld the federal district court's denial of a motion for a preliminary injunction by several Republican voters who alleged partisan gerrymandering in Maryland.

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1
Koons v. United States 1:00:33

7 years temu1:00:33

1:00:33

A case in which the Court decided that the petitioners, who were criminal defendants, were not eligible for sentence reductions under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) because their sentences were not “based on” their lowered Federal Sentencing Guidelines ranges, but rather were “based on” the mandatory minimum sentences for their offenses and their substantial assistance to the government.…

U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1
Hughes v. United States 52:24

7 years temu52:24

52:24

A case in which the Court decided that a sentence imposed pursuant to a Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(C) (“Type C”) plea bargain is “based on” the defendant’s Federal Sentencing Guidelines range as long as that range was a component of the framework the court used in imposing the sentence or accepting the plea bargain, meaning that in this case, Erik Hughes could seek a sentencing reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).…

Zapraszamy w Player FM

Odtwarzacz FM skanuje sieć w poszukiwaniu wysokiej jakości podcastów, abyś mógł się nią cieszyć już teraz. To najlepsza aplikacja do podcastów, działająca na Androidzie, iPhonie i Internecie. Zarejestruj się, aby zsynchronizować subskrypcje na różnych urządzeniach.