))
Sidebar: (Review and Update) Dominion V. Fox – Summary Judgement Motions – Mean What?
Manage episode 360061703 series 3458247
Treść dostarczona przez legalanatomy/GaryBell. Cała zawartość podcastów, w tym odcinki, grafika i opisy podcastów, jest przesyłana i udostępniana bezpośrednio przez legalanatomy/GaryBell lub jego partnera na platformie podcastów. Jeśli uważasz, że ktoś wykorzystuje Twoje dzieło chronione prawem autorskim bez Twojej zgody, możesz postępować zgodnie z procedurą opisaną tutaj https://pl.player.fm/legal.
Gary and Brad are discussing the MAJOR DEVELOPMENTS in the case of Dominion vs. Fox. In our previous show on March 2nd, Brad explained the law of defamation and then went into the case explaining where Dominion vs. Fox has a higher burden of proof and a higher standard in this lawsuit. You can go back, catch up and listen to this episode! https://legalanatomy.podbean.com/e/dominion-vs-fox/
Today we have new developments regarding motions for summary judgments that are rarely used - why are they used here? Both sides filed motions for summary judgments - meaning both sides want the judge to rule right now that there is no trial and to rule in the favor of one side - trial goes away. This is significant! Listen to the riveting fact of this case and learn why! Download, Listen & Subscribe!
We are Bell & Pollock, P.C., a Denver law firm and we give you a legal analysis of the most current events in the country in a non-bias, non-partisan format. We give you a legal breakdown - we call it "Anatomizing your mind"; breaking down the legal components of each case we discuss. Be sure to listen and subscribe! Contact us if you have any questions or would like to suggest a topic for one of our upcoming podcasts! - info@legalanatomy.net
39 odcinków
Udostępnij
