Diddy's Reply Memo In Further Support Of Combs Defendants Motion To Dismiss (Part 2) (1/11/25)

Beyond The Horizon

In the case of McKinney v. Combs (Case No. 1:24-cv-03931), the Combs defendants filed a reply memorandum supporting their motion to dismiss the amended complaint. They argue that the plaintiff's allegations lack sufficient legal basis and fail to meet the necessary standards for a viable claim. Specifically, the defendants contend that the complaint does not provide adequate factual details to substantiate the claims made against them, rendering the lawsuit legally insufficient.
Additionally, the defendants assert that certain claims may be barred by statutes of limitations or other legal doctrines, further undermining the plaintiff's case. They highlight that the amended complaint includes vague and conclusory statements without specific evidence linking the defendants to the alleged misconduct. Based on these points, the defendants request that the court dismiss the amended complaint in its entirety
(commercial at 9:21)
to contact me:
[e-mail]
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.621909.38.0.pdf