Artwork

Treść dostarczona przez Peter C. Kiefer. Cała zawartość podcastów, w tym odcinki, grafika i opisy podcastów, jest przesyłana i udostępniana bezpośrednio przez Peter C. Kiefer lub jego partnera na platformie podcastów. Jeśli uważasz, że ktoś wykorzystuje Twoje dzieło chronione prawem autorskim bez Twojej zgody, możesz postępować zgodnie z procedurą opisaną tutaj https://pl.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - aplikacja do podcastów
Przejdź do trybu offline z Player FM !

The Voice of the Profession: Public Confidence in the Courts

23:35
 
Udostępnij
 

Manage episode 315464578 series 3144837
Treść dostarczona przez Peter C. Kiefer. Cała zawartość podcastów, w tym odcinki, grafika i opisy podcastów, jest przesyłana i udostępniana bezpośrednio przez Peter C. Kiefer lub jego partnera na platformie podcastów. Jeśli uważasz, że ktoś wykorzystuje Twoje dzieło chronione prawem autorskim bez Twojej zgody, możesz postępować zgodnie z procedurą opisaną tutaj https://pl.player.fm/legal.

December 21st Court Leader’s Advantage Podcast Episode

The preliminary results from NACM’s Voice of the Profession survey have revealed folks' number one issue this year: Public Confidence in the Courts. Over 95% of those responding reported that they either agreed or strongly agreed that NACM needs to advocate on behalf of the courts regarding the public’s confidence in our court system. This result is no surprise. The 2021 National Center for State Courts “State of the Courts” survey conducted this past October reported that public trust and confidence in the courts has sunk to a new low: 64%.

A common response to this issue is “we need more public outreach.” If we could just explain what we do and why we did it, the community would immediately embrace the court’s central role in society. This has been disparagingly referred to as the “to know us is to love us” approach. The community may actually know more about the courts than we think and yet remain less than satisfied. Here are three examples of why the public might have a negative impression of courts:

1. Many folks, including our fellow court professionals, think that courts are too complicated, particularly for self-represented litigants

2. Excessive fines, surcharges, and user fees that courts pile on can hobble defendants guilty of relatively minor crimes

3. Courts can exhibit subtle yet systemic bias against people of color, the mentally ill, and the poor.

Some of the questions we will explore this month include:

· Why do we think the public’s confidence in the courts is declining?

· What can and should courts do about this lack of confidence?

· What is NACM’s role in addressing this challenge?

· What advice do these court professionals have for the rest of us?

Today’s Panel includes:

· Samantha Wallis, Assistant Court Administrator for the District Court, in Coeur d’Alene Idaho

· Greg Lambard, Trial Court Administrator for the Superior Court in Middlesex Vicinage, New Jersey

· Danielle Trujillo, Court Administrator for the Municipal Court in Littleton, Colorado

  continue reading

97 odcinków

Artwork
iconUdostępnij
 
Manage episode 315464578 series 3144837
Treść dostarczona przez Peter C. Kiefer. Cała zawartość podcastów, w tym odcinki, grafika i opisy podcastów, jest przesyłana i udostępniana bezpośrednio przez Peter C. Kiefer lub jego partnera na platformie podcastów. Jeśli uważasz, że ktoś wykorzystuje Twoje dzieło chronione prawem autorskim bez Twojej zgody, możesz postępować zgodnie z procedurą opisaną tutaj https://pl.player.fm/legal.

December 21st Court Leader’s Advantage Podcast Episode

The preliminary results from NACM’s Voice of the Profession survey have revealed folks' number one issue this year: Public Confidence in the Courts. Over 95% of those responding reported that they either agreed or strongly agreed that NACM needs to advocate on behalf of the courts regarding the public’s confidence in our court system. This result is no surprise. The 2021 National Center for State Courts “State of the Courts” survey conducted this past October reported that public trust and confidence in the courts has sunk to a new low: 64%.

A common response to this issue is “we need more public outreach.” If we could just explain what we do and why we did it, the community would immediately embrace the court’s central role in society. This has been disparagingly referred to as the “to know us is to love us” approach. The community may actually know more about the courts than we think and yet remain less than satisfied. Here are three examples of why the public might have a negative impression of courts:

1. Many folks, including our fellow court professionals, think that courts are too complicated, particularly for self-represented litigants

2. Excessive fines, surcharges, and user fees that courts pile on can hobble defendants guilty of relatively minor crimes

3. Courts can exhibit subtle yet systemic bias against people of color, the mentally ill, and the poor.

Some of the questions we will explore this month include:

· Why do we think the public’s confidence in the courts is declining?

· What can and should courts do about this lack of confidence?

· What is NACM’s role in addressing this challenge?

· What advice do these court professionals have for the rest of us?

Today’s Panel includes:

· Samantha Wallis, Assistant Court Administrator for the District Court, in Coeur d’Alene Idaho

· Greg Lambard, Trial Court Administrator for the Superior Court in Middlesex Vicinage, New Jersey

· Danielle Trujillo, Court Administrator for the Municipal Court in Littleton, Colorado

  continue reading

97 odcinków

Wszystkie odcinki

×
 
Loading …

Zapraszamy w Player FM

Odtwarzacz FM skanuje sieć w poszukiwaniu wysokiej jakości podcastów, abyś mógł się nią cieszyć już teraz. To najlepsza aplikacja do podcastów, działająca na Androidzie, iPhonie i Internecie. Zarejestruj się, aby zsynchronizować subskrypcje na różnych urządzeniach.

 

Skrócona instrukcja obsługi