FTR#‘s 1322, 1323 and 1324 Interviews with Jim DiEugenio and Paul Bleau about “Chokeholds”

Dave Emory's "For The Record"

Introduction: These programs set forth the legal concept of "Chokeholds" on the JFK assassination--dynamics that prove, legally, that there was a conspiracy. These do not necessarily resonate precisely with aspects of the historical record, which embraces, but does not delineate, principles of law. Key Points of Discussion and Analysis Include: How some lawyers introduced the concepts we discuss; What is the concept of “consilience?;” Analyze the “Investigations Timeline”—detailed in the Introduction; What is meant by “Standard of Proof?”; How does “Beyond a Reasonable Doubt” figure into the “Chokeholds” concept?; How does “Civil Standards of Proof” factor in?; How does the HSCA Standard of Proof” factor in?; How does the ARRB’s Standard of Proof factor in?; Finally—the JFK Assassinations Chokehold Standard of Proof”—How does this factor in?; Analysis of the 60 years of obstruction of justice in the JFK case; Analysis of the Rockefeller Commission; The Rockefeller Commission's inclusion of Lyman Lemnitzer and Ronald Reagan--two very strange choices; The Rockefeller Commission's selection of Warren Commission counsel David Belin to handle its legal maneuvering; The Rockefeller Commission's use of Richard Lindenberg--a Paperclip veteran; Review of the deep political role of Leon Jaworski in the trial over the killing of Corporal Kunze, the Dachau Medical trials and his participation in the Texas Court of Inquiry along with Robert Storey; Review of networking between Ray Rocca, Paul Patrini and James Angleton dating back to World War II; The House Select Committee on Assassinations' use of George Joannides as a liaison with the CIA; Review of Joannides' work with Carlos Bringuier and the DRE at the time of the Kennedy assassination; review of the HSCA's endorsement of the doctored autopsy evidence at Bethesda; Review of Watergate and Nixon's presence in Dallas on 11/22/1963.