))
LAWSPLAINING: CAN SOCIAL MEDIA LAWFULLY MANIPULATE WHAT POSTS YOU SEE?
Manage episode 435186885 series 3334358
Treść dostarczona przez Bing Bang. Cała zawartość podcastów, w tym odcinki, grafika i opisy podcastów, jest przesyłana i udostępniana bezpośrednio przez Bing Bang lub jego partnera na platformie podcastów. Jeśli uważasz, że ktoś wykorzystuje Twoje dzieło chronione prawem autorskim bez Twojej zgody, możesz postępować zgodnie z procedurą opisaną tutaj https://pl.player.fm/legal.
In this episode of Law ‘Splaining, host Bobby Rehkemper tackles a pressing and controversial question: Can states compel social media platforms to more fairly balance the information that appears in people’s feeds? Dive into the legal limits on social media as Bobby explores the complexities of this issue, breaking down the recent Supreme Court case Moody v. Net Choice. This case challenges the boundaries of government regulation on social media and provides a deep dive into the evolving limits of digital content control.
Discover how the Court's decision influences the debate over whether big tech companies can use their algorithms and editorial choices to shape the visibility of content according to their views. In this episode, lively discussion and expert insights reveal the intersection of constitutional rights and digital freedom. Tune in to grasp the nuances of this high-stakes legal battle and explore its implications for the future of online content regulation.
Thanks for tuning in to this episode on the GRL RAW podcast network! For more legal insights, tips, and discussions, visit our website at GRL Law.
Don't forget to subscribe and leave us a review on your favorite podcast platform. Stay informed, stay empowered with GRL RAW.
Social Channels
YouTube
Facebook
Instagram
38 odcinków
Udostępnij
