#172: How to Tell That Your Classical Conditioning Plan is Working

Drinking From the Toilet: Real dogs, Real training

Treść dostarczona przez Drinking from the Toilet: Real Dogs, Real Training and Hannah Branigan. Cała zawartość podcastów, w tym odcinki, grafika i opisy podcastów, jest przesyłana i udostępniana bezpośrednio przez Drinking from the Toilet: Real Dogs, Real Training and Hannah Branigan lub jego partnera na platformie podcastów. Jeśli uważasz, że ktoś wykorzystuje Twoje dzieło chronione prawem autorskim bez Twojej zgody, możesz postępować zgodnie z procedurą opisaną tutaj https://pl.player.fm/legal.

2y ago 25:45

MP3•Źródło odcinka

When we pair two stimuli together as part of a classical conditioning training plan, it can sometimes be hard to determine when the association has been made between the old stimulus and the new stimulus… the “food” and the “bell”, to draw from a popular example. In this episode, I answer a question submitted by a patron with some ideas on what to look for to determine if that association is strong enough and it’s time to proceed to the next step.

In this episode, we discuss quick review of conditioned emotional response, what happens when you pair a reinforcer with a stimulus in the environment, using this strategy to build a specific, positive CER in a training session, a recap of Lindsay Wood Brown’s work on resource guarding, and applying this strategy to stimulus-stimulus pairing with scent.

For full show notes and transcript, visit: www.hannahbranigan.dog/podcast/172 This podcast is supported by MET Conference 2023: www.metconference.com/

189 odcinków

#Dogs #Lifestyle #Dogagility #Dogbehavior #Dogobedience #Dogtraining #Puppytraining #Showdogtraining #Kids And Families #Drinking from the Toilet: Real Dogs, Real Training #Hannah Branigan #Animals and Pets #Hobbies