))
WebLoad vs LoadRunner vs jMeter (Who Wins?) with Paul Kanaris
Manage episode 440648650 series 3418029
Treść dostarczona przez Joe Colantonio. Cała zawartość podcastów, w tym odcinki, grafika i opisy podcastów, jest przesyłana i udostępniana bezpośrednio przez Joe Colantonio lub jego partnera na platformie podcastów. Jeśli uważasz, że ktoś wykorzystuje Twoje dzieło chronione prawem autorskim bez Twojej zgody, możesz postępować zgodnie z procedurą opisaną tutaj https://pl.player.fm/legal.
Today, we're thrilled to have performance testing expert Paul Kanaris, with over 20 years of experience, join us to compare two leading load testing tools: Webload and LoadRunner. This episode, hosted by Joe Colantonio, explores the intricate details of Paul's journey from LoadRunner to jMeter to Webload, drawing on his deep expertise in the field.
Try WebLoad for yourself now for free: https://testguild.me/loadtrial
Paul shares valuable insights on AI implementation preferences, tool flexibility's importance, and robust support's critical role. We'll discuss how these tools handle diverse enterprise challenges, from managing multiple interconnected systems to navigating complex backend protocols. Topics also include:
The pros and cons of using JavaScript versus C for scripting. The cost efficiencies of transitioning tools. The strategic advantage of Webload's cloud-based, globally accessible platform.
Whether you're a performance engineer or simply exploring load-testing tools to improve your DevOps practices, this episode is packed with practical advice and real-world experiences. Get ready to dive deep into the world of load testing and discover which tool might best fit your organization's needs.
100 odcinków
Udostępnij
