))
Abortion Pills and Vaccine Mandates
Manage episode 424266602 series 3344448
Treść dostarczona przez Tim Kowal & Jeff Lewis, Tim Kowal, and Jeff Lewis. Cała zawartość podcastów, w tym odcinki, grafika i opisy podcastów, jest przesyłana i udostępniana bezpośrednio przez Tim Kowal & Jeff Lewis, Tim Kowal, and Jeff Lewis lub jego partnera na platformie podcastów. Jeśli uważasz, że ktoś wykorzystuje Twoje dzieło chronione prawem autorskim bez Twojej zgody, możesz postępować zgodnie z procedurą opisaną tutaj https://pl.player.fm/legal.
We have a few big cases to cover:
- The Supreme Court, 9-0, guaranteed continued access to abortion pills.
- A 9th Circuit split panel, meanwhile, allows a challenge to a Covid-19 vaccine mandate to proceed, challenging Buck v. Bell forced sterilization-era public health precedent.
- And a get-out-of-arbitration-free card case get reversed on FAA grounds, holding the legislature may not insist that courts interpret arbitration contracts different from other kinds of contracts.
Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography, LinkedIn profile, and Twitter feed.
Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography, LinkedIn profile, Twitter feed, and YouTube page.
Sign up for Not To Be Published, Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases.
Other items discussed in the episode:
- Videos from this episode will be posted at Tim Kowal’s YouTube channel.
- **Late payment does not defeat arbitration because that CAA rule is preempted by FAA—but Justice Baker dissents Hernandez v. Sohnen Enters.** (D2d5 May 22, 2024 No. B323303) [cert. for pub.]
- **Courts cannot limit 170.6 challenges by local rule Lorch v. Superior Court** (D4d1 May 16, 2024 No. D083609) [pub. opn.]
- SCOTUS on Abortion Pill - Food & Drug Admin. v. All. for Hippocratic Med. (June 13, 2024, No. 23-235)
154 odcinków
Udostępnij
