Artwork

Treść dostarczona przez Ed Straw and Philip Tottenham, Ed Straw, and Philip Tottenham. Cała zawartość podcastów, w tym odcinki, grafika i opisy podcastów, jest przesyłana i udostępniana bezpośrednio przez Ed Straw and Philip Tottenham, Ed Straw, and Philip Tottenham lub jego partnera na platformie podcastów. Jeśli uważasz, że ktoś wykorzystuje Twoje dzieło chronione prawem autorskim bez Twojej zgody, możesz postępować zgodnie z procedurą opisaną tutaj https://pl.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - aplikacja do podcastów
Przejdź do trybu offline z Player FM !

Check 17 - Governments - Experiment

30:07
 
Udostępnij
 

Manage episode 295358466 series 2812514
Treść dostarczona przez Ed Straw and Philip Tottenham, Ed Straw, and Philip Tottenham. Cała zawartość podcastów, w tym odcinki, grafika i opisy podcastów, jest przesyłana i udostępniana bezpośrednio przez Ed Straw and Philip Tottenham, Ed Straw, and Philip Tottenham lub jego partnera na platformie podcastów. Jeśli uważasz, że ktoś wykorzystuje Twoje dzieło chronione prawem autorskim bez Twojej zgody, możesz postępować zgodnie z procedurą opisaną tutaj https://pl.player.fm/legal.

Recognise that most ‘decisions’ by government are political experiments.


...except that with normal experiments - the scientific kind - measurements are taken, changes are monitored, conclusions drawn, theory is adjusted.


Oddly, this is not the case with government decisions: debate is held, rehearsing the full repertoire of grimace, flush, sound and fury; and someone wins, and after that - a hot cup of tea. No connection with implementation. And yet with almost every regulation it is impossible to get a full view of how this adjustment to law or regulation will play out in reality, with the inevitable unintended consequences - so we end up with decision makers who are not fully informed making decisions for people who aren't aware that anything has changed. Even more jaw-dropping - roughly 150 of these changes occur each week per ministry. That's about 10,000 per year, year after year, in a kind of nightmare of bureaucratic process.


How would it be if, rather than decisions being taken, forgotten, and tossed into the bureaucratic machine, they were seen as designs for action, to be monitored and adjusted as their process unfolds?


In this episode we survey the ghastly scene of current decision-making, and find hope in the impact of the pandemic.


Talking points:


Decisions: words on a piece of paper, or designs for action


Wandering from start line to start line without staying to watch the race


The sheer volume and impossibility of keeping track


How subsidiarity would alleviate this


The Tiny Top and the noise


The end-state fallacy: housing developments post-war, EU and CO2 emmissions


The whole new-liberal economic system is an experiment


PAPAIS - the dark truth of how government functions


Ashby's Law of Requisite Variety: Science and system


The limitations of government


Ostrom: “Human societies are constituted by the symulateous operation of various experiments variously linked to one another”


The government should be setting up the system


The pandemic has forced experimentation


The Observatory for Public Sector Innovation


The Monetary Policy Committee at the Bank of England


Links:


The Observatory for Public Sector Innovation - for more on this see Series 1 Episode 5, The Sense of Powerlessness at the Heart of Leadership with Dr. Piret Toñurist.

https://oecd-opsi.org


The Monetary Policy Committee at the Bank of England

https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/about/people/monetary-policy-committee


W. Ross Ashby

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._Ross_Ashby


Law of Requisite Variety:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variety_(cybernetics)#Law_of_requisite_variety


Vincent Ostrom: "Human societies... are constituted by the simultaneous operation of diverse experiments variously linked to one another."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vincent_Ostrom


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  continue reading

46 odcinków

Artwork
iconUdostępnij
 
Manage episode 295358466 series 2812514
Treść dostarczona przez Ed Straw and Philip Tottenham, Ed Straw, and Philip Tottenham. Cała zawartość podcastów, w tym odcinki, grafika i opisy podcastów, jest przesyłana i udostępniana bezpośrednio przez Ed Straw and Philip Tottenham, Ed Straw, and Philip Tottenham lub jego partnera na platformie podcastów. Jeśli uważasz, że ktoś wykorzystuje Twoje dzieło chronione prawem autorskim bez Twojej zgody, możesz postępować zgodnie z procedurą opisaną tutaj https://pl.player.fm/legal.

Recognise that most ‘decisions’ by government are political experiments.


...except that with normal experiments - the scientific kind - measurements are taken, changes are monitored, conclusions drawn, theory is adjusted.


Oddly, this is not the case with government decisions: debate is held, rehearsing the full repertoire of grimace, flush, sound and fury; and someone wins, and after that - a hot cup of tea. No connection with implementation. And yet with almost every regulation it is impossible to get a full view of how this adjustment to law or regulation will play out in reality, with the inevitable unintended consequences - so we end up with decision makers who are not fully informed making decisions for people who aren't aware that anything has changed. Even more jaw-dropping - roughly 150 of these changes occur each week per ministry. That's about 10,000 per year, year after year, in a kind of nightmare of bureaucratic process.


How would it be if, rather than decisions being taken, forgotten, and tossed into the bureaucratic machine, they were seen as designs for action, to be monitored and adjusted as their process unfolds?


In this episode we survey the ghastly scene of current decision-making, and find hope in the impact of the pandemic.


Talking points:


Decisions: words on a piece of paper, or designs for action


Wandering from start line to start line without staying to watch the race


The sheer volume and impossibility of keeping track


How subsidiarity would alleviate this


The Tiny Top and the noise


The end-state fallacy: housing developments post-war, EU and CO2 emmissions


The whole new-liberal economic system is an experiment


PAPAIS - the dark truth of how government functions


Ashby's Law of Requisite Variety: Science and system


The limitations of government


Ostrom: “Human societies are constituted by the symulateous operation of various experiments variously linked to one another”


The government should be setting up the system


The pandemic has forced experimentation


The Observatory for Public Sector Innovation


The Monetary Policy Committee at the Bank of England


Links:


The Observatory for Public Sector Innovation - for more on this see Series 1 Episode 5, The Sense of Powerlessness at the Heart of Leadership with Dr. Piret Toñurist.

https://oecd-opsi.org


The Monetary Policy Committee at the Bank of England

https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/about/people/monetary-policy-committee


W. Ross Ashby

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._Ross_Ashby


Law of Requisite Variety:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variety_(cybernetics)#Law_of_requisite_variety


Vincent Ostrom: "Human societies... are constituted by the simultaneous operation of diverse experiments variously linked to one another."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vincent_Ostrom


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  continue reading

46 odcinków

Alle episoder

×
 
Loading …

Zapraszamy w Player FM

Odtwarzacz FM skanuje sieć w poszukiwaniu wysokiej jakości podcastów, abyś mógł się nią cieszyć już teraz. To najlepsza aplikacja do podcastów, działająca na Androidzie, iPhonie i Internecie. Zarejestruj się, aby zsynchronizować subskrypcje na różnych urządzeniach.

 

Skrócona instrukcja obsługi